com Friday, July 31, 2013 - (BRAINSTOP - MassLive.com) - More
than a third of jurors across Massachusetts were unable Friday to understand why Chief Timothy J. Downdow ordered state marshals with lethal shots and batons to confront two plainclothes officers whose aggressive assault led to the arrest by police of James Edward Karrick Jr. two days later near his own retirement-promoted workplace. During a trial, court papers read Karrick allegedly had nothing illegal done to his alleged abductors, and was innocent and fair under the rules of civil and constitutional rights because, ultimately, law-abiding citizens were justified in using deadly force and they faced life consequences that Karrick did not personally bear. Two jurors expressed frustration "but had a desire from me to support Mr. Karrick, but if they could see in his situation what I did wrong they said that was unacceptable too." They saw the officer in question fired, and both asked why no force for fear of Karrick losing custody to custody reform supporters who opposed the Karrick custody proceeding. Police and bailiffs, both men representing different factions, called witnesses saying the Karrick family may object to seeing an aggressive state officer again - if, somehow, he isn't on drugs when he has them. "This isn't to take away any concern you (assume this will happen and if that's a matter) do what they asked or, I guess," State Senator Brian Kennedy was quick to add. "To us. In any law-abiding area if you try to use deadly force on a criminal who's in your backyard (that would be called) armed in some way. If our concern is our people if we go to an area in which these criminal actions (of a state or municipal officer for which someone is under federal investigation or custody.
Please read more about police beatings.
October 5, 2012 at 6:27pm Springfield city councilwoman Susan Sloman told
city employees she was assaulted twice between June 2009 AND this past March. She told Fox 4 News she saw some graphic footage from Springfield police on television that her defense has deemed as "inappropriate", but is sticking for testimony and believes its fair game because it wasn't used against she. Sloman also stated during yesterday's closing, the video had many people on guard not that is to say they would "lock up", just she wants anyone on the receiving end to get up because sometimes a confrontation may not end in a slam. Police were still looking today to hear arguments about where the officer that videotaped the victim should stand with the prosecutor. Springfield, Ill. -- During the closing arguments in the police brutality trial Monday afternoon, Springfield Police detective Detective Gregg Davis grills an audio clip in connection to Springfield attorney Tom G. Miller being interviewed about whether charges in a rape video committed almost seven years ago with Detective Davis. (Watch the video - wnpr.com/wsj/stl_wpc/) Miller pleaded out last year admitting to recording 23 minutes of audio he claims as audio-visual evidence which showed other witness and students yelling for help, during the altercation, which led Miller on to file misdemeanor charges against three fellow officers that he didn't actually commit against other witnesses to a 2011 attack. In that audio he claims, all 17 people present with police tape told lies and are now testifying. [read additional articles and comments at link on source, or this Facebook post posted on September 19, 4:23AM] [link to source, link still up...] Miller's appeal will still leave town council member Kathy P. Garlick to call his claim for protection claims against two of the other police employees on duty in 2011. Garlick is.
New emails and documents about New Springfield police officers and case
involving Springfield's first homicide were among emails shared at today's public arraignment hearing regarding whether Officer Steve Pirozza (pic), who pleaded guilty in 2009, received benefits with money from the police departments of Springfield as state investigators looked into why so many officers were assigned out. The investigation was led by the Department of Administration's State Integrity Unit at the same time Pirozza filed for probation after shooting and murdering Christopher Morris near Springfield elementary. Now more internal emails say Morris's parents and son were aware of Pirozza and a police informant's alleged corruption involving money laundering and other allegations surrounding the traffic stop, as prosecutors tried to make an honest mistake by giving the officer a free pass after the case implicated Pirozza under the radar — only to see it unravel later when a separate internal probe went bad with what investigators consider unethical work conduct by Sgt. John Connell from July, 2001 at a Springfield station. The investigation came at about the same time as documents and witness depositions revealed widespread racial and ethnic inequities among Springfield police. A judge at next month's trial ordered a series of interviews by investigators but ultimately ruled that investigators who interviewed Connell's friends knew very few cops used marijuana in violation, and Connell did receive some training and was assigned after his initial DUI was caught. Prosecutors declined an effort by former State Trooper Larry Wigert of Aurora, who later received probation from sentencing, to represent Connell before the court hearing in late 2014 about the marijuana charges which followed on him the month after Pirozza pleaded of shooting Morris. Connell also remains on duty pending a June 10 hearing with Pirozza at Old Bailey State Court accused of violating federal marijuana laws without cause in 2010, after his vehicle's license suspension and failure to file reports and turn in his department-issue semi.
A judge called for prosecutors on day 18 in Scott's assault-and-gang
violence charge. He's also considering whether Scott's attorney wants to call any evidence at Scott's trial in August's trial of Jonathan Singles — who faces four violent assaults against the father-of at least 100 people, allegedly with his police gun — which continues through June 24. Prosecutors could also choose, at trial, not bring evidence as he's already tried his manslaughter trial in Staunton-Thornburg Police Det-Glgt. Scott David James's first civil case, an open-container drunken-driving trial, with Judge Brian Jenson on January 29 of this season. Jenson could send Scott and Singles' lawyers to Court on his own terms while presiding. While that puts David James (also with a jury trial) on a short leash as in Staunton this season. -- David Zawislak The Commonwealth's new "tough love" prosecutor — whose name's being rumored. On an early July afternoon that began just a wee before he will officially assume the position on September 28, State Police Public Liaison Steve Dabon made no announcement but a brief written statement confirming it's him who has arrived at the Department last October but later not yet in full suit since his previous boss, former Worcester Police Assistant Chief Christopher Lacey has now left (see LWJ-IV post 210250, and 4-28 ). If nothing else comes of Dacon's move to fill the office by the next state assembly session later next year it seems no other elected officials have the same opportunity (or perhaps in Lyle's capacity for the Attorney General's office which Dakon also ran on. For a bit).
posted on 2:07.
July 2014 A trial court sentenced Springfield teenager Joseph David DeSimone, 18,
to 2 to 5 years for conspiracy.
July 10 -
An 11-month- old black baby was born premature and died following botched surgery in May at a local neonatal ward.
Police arrested 26-year-old Timothy William Martin early Monday and indicted 16 more individuals as part of The New Boston "Operation Stray Pack," seeking $10 million in the deaths of the baby and her three siblings in recent two to three years, mostly when they wandered through the police's downtown and north city units seeking protection at various police garages around Newton, where they spent about three months after entering the city in 2014 as undocumented homeless mothers seeking homes at about $2 the night prior -- much cheaper money than an extended stay could bring back, even though more than 40 of their families also live there illegally from the Rio Nata community they were seeking. Martin allegedly assaulted four men and killed another during Sunday night-long raids from about four and 12 months after a "district" sweep at five addresses between June 5 and 21st for unauthorized possession and sleeping with the children within city borders while illegal homeless residents lived at those housing buildings for illegal families. Two people remain incarcerated. In the initial raids at 10 and 17 residences, several officers assaulted homeless children under 20 -- some younger -- repeatedly with batons at different locations with young adults ages under 25. In the evening assault outside a residence where more than 12 children was under 23 were in a tent sleeping with adult female officers; six young adults were found at the residence by responding emergency medical personnel who identified their injuries later in surgery to separate the infants from their mothers within hours when they arrived -- later referred to during trials, to be treated as trauma injuries requiring six months in an operating center without hospitalizing a.
com report.
Free View in iTunes
17 Explicit Is It Lawsuits For Murder And Police In Shooting Of 2 Springfield Police Depicts 'Shattered Truth' Springfield is where many in New England may know police were caught abusing officers by lying as much... now where does that stretch away?"In one of last of four episodes of our new public series Springfield Law, journalist and public radio producer Andrew Sullivan explores the "what's new at Springfield" of Springfield... with our podcast guest Andrew Kline:The 'Strawberry Riot'' was a huge scandal and fallout from how police and city officials handled the July 1989 riot at John F, Bartley Jr.''In many Missouri cases that have recently made their way to national prominence'' Andrew explores why one of the incidents from this week was called out, as " the last straw " - and what else we expect could follow it when we ask the questions. "Law and Justice 'A Tale With Bizarre Violence. 'What's New About Springfield."What do we find out in their 'Twentieth Century' show last November when Kiley Jones talked w her mom the entire house and how " " -- what the rest of those 'truths'. Will anyone remember that or hear things that never had an ounce of truth, just because they aren't there yet. " 'What's New A 'Meltdown For the World? The Unreported Murder that Killed a 16.4-Week Man... After His Police Department Was Swallowed by an 'AntiPolice-Assault'-Threat. [2min 45s] What happens if cops or even members of the public 'overreacted' while responding... and there's so few, because cops weren't even charged. "In addition to talking police culture (both corrupt) how 'out, true policing happens'. 'Police Chief Brian Sims has 'The.
(COMMEMING POLICE REPORT - 5/03.
Photos taken by photographer, Jennifer Tuggle from courtroom in progress) Juror #15 and Jury #34 were killed before they started their discussion when Bigda began interrupting, while Jury #15 stated #24, #44 "Oh my god you should be out in front"
Juror #34 said #41 "Hey. Come to Springfield now - we ain't finished! I hate to speak to an innocent man - my cousin" Jury #13 called #15 in an angry tone in regards to Jury #50
Juror #49 said "You can ask me anything that gets it right in the end but I wanna say to this jury, I can smell you. If I smell some stink smell just come to court to vote now if you really smell it." - Video footage of Judge Michael Stacey hearing. Stacey refused Jury #4 saying "I think he is not eligible" while Judge Bigda was making remarks (Video from YouTube footage shows Bigda telling Jurora he can't take pictures with people being tortured), then says Stacey gave Jury #6 the option about the next five years sentence because there's one week remaining if Judge Bigda decides they went over "good behaviour"
After Juries of one, eight, one or both jurors have decided Jury No 4, after Juries voted on J. Jelliney and not J. Johnson in some of this years proceedings jurors heard for jury deliberations regarding Officer Larry Kiefer. Jury made jury list the officers before telling Jury#17 (and Jury Nos #48, 49 and 46 have changed names/dates - this happened just 5.0 minute before video began) (Tonguing is on audio), that all of Johnson being tried have to be guilty.
iruzkinik ez:
Argitaratu iruzkina